Beholding Salad

Image via Wikipedia

Is does seem like it. I think about how in unison every organism in their respective ecosystems are dependent on the flow of that ecosystem, and even in a single entity, how the processes within are kept to maintain. Why would nature work so hard to preserve as much as possible if there were not a purpose to being. This does not mean that then people are supposed to be alive. First of all, because “supposed” is indicative of another consciousness, and not the omniscience of sight, any statement regarding it would be false. And something can be without needing to be, or wanted. Want, ladies and gentlemen, is a pain of the eyes and of the heart, and maybe more of the mind. But that is all it is, pain. So, how can we just suffer for the sake of suffering? Anyone see a reason? Exactly, things can be, without want, or need, or intention, or force, or reason. And from that very standard it is not.

I want to attempt to understand; but there is something there that stands in the way. It reacts to my eyes with witness, it reacts to my pain with need. It finds my intention and presents uncertainty. In attempt of reason and in truth, what it lets me find is doubt.

  I think I can be sure of the fact that people are alive, and they do things like recognize the being of others just as easily as they perceive their own being. They are capable of a level of distinct action, although human capacity is a precarious thing. Why? As something reaches its full, it degrades. It is cycle, because it then reaches a point where it can then recover. Recede, recover, recede, recover.

What do I expect that purpose to be?

Maybe that is all the purpose there is. Something pushes, another pulls.

Related articles by Zemanta

• How to inspire action (socialfish.org)
• Prehistoric Landscape Returns to Europe (neatorama.com)